" />
Published On: Mon, Jul 21st, 2014

Chinese Supplier Sold Old, Reconditioned Food to YUM & McDonalds

Share This

Susanne Posel (OC) : The Shanghai Food and Drug Administration has suspended operations at the Shanghai Husi Food Co. (SHFC), owned by OSI Group in Illinois, storehouse because the corporation was providing their customers with expired meat that had been reconditioned and given new expiration dates.

Dragon Television caught this processing plant reprocessing “expired and discarded meat”; sometimes picking food up from the floor and adding it to the processing machines.

Food_McDonalds_Yum_KFC_USA_SP_OCDavid McDonald, president of OSI said in 2013: “There is no other place in the world growing as quickly as China, and we feel fortunate to be a part of it. We look at China as the number one growth effort among all of our global activities.”

So far, OSI is cooperating with the Chinese government in current investigations into the old and expired food that was reconditioned and sold as new.

SHFC’s customers include McDonalds, and Yum Brands who owns KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut.

McDonalds issued this statement: “Food safety is a top priority for McDonald’s. [We are pursuing] strict compliance with consumer safety laws and regulations [and has] zero tolerance for illegal behavior.”

The practice of reconditioning old food is allowed in the US by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In order to save money, some corporations will repackage older food into new packaging and resell it.

One public school lunch supplier tried this with moldy apple sauce re-canned and was reprimanded to never try that “stunt” again. The FDA was contacted by Snokist Growers of Yakima, Washington. This is just one group trying to ensure “reworking” food is not a normal practice.

“I was appalled that there were actually human beings that were OK with this,” said Kantha Shelke, a food scientist and spokeswoman for the Institute of Food Technologists. “This is a case of unsafe food. They are trying to salvage that to make a buck.”

Shockingly, Jay Cole, former federal inspector who works with the FDA Group, says, “Any food can be reconditioned.”

Examples could be:

  • Perhaps pieces of pasta will be re-ground into semolina.
  • Mislabeled blueberry ice cream mixed with chocolate to avoid waste.
  • Insect parts discovered in cocoa beans.
  • Live bugs “left behind” in dried fruits packages.
  • Or salmonella bacteria found in hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP) which is a flavor enhancer used in gravy mix, snack foods, dairy products, spices and soups (just to name a few).

Shelke said: “This is how people do their business.”

The FDA allowed food producers like Basic Food Flavors, Inc (BFF) to recondition their recalled items in 2010 by heat-treating their products to remove salmonella. BFF then reprocessed the food and distributed them for sale to the public.

The FDA justifies this unsafe practice by stating that it reduces water and saves money. Yet this occurs at the expense of public safety and health.

If the processes approved by the FDA were rendering food safe for consumption, there would be less of an issue.

The Snokist officials found that the process the FDA permitted as safe for the reconditioning of the applesauce rendered the food sterile and effectively worthless as a nutritional substance by a common toxin produced by the mold in the apple sauce.

The FDA stands by its thermal process even though it does not protect against mycotoxins in the food.

“Mold is not an easily reconditionable product,” says William Correll, the FDA’s acting director of compliance.

The FDA admits they expect a certain level of contaminants and toxins to enter food during the processing process because they claim a zero-tolerance policy would be too difficult to achieve.

The FDA relies on defect action levels to define how dangerous a contaminant is in the food and how much enforcement of their policies they should engage the manufacturer in. Basically, if making the food safe is too difficult, the FDA does not bother enforcing their safety policies.

Here are a few examples of allowable contaminants:

  • In 8 ounces of macaroni there could be 225 insect fragments or 4.5 rodent hairs
  • In 3.5 oz of canned mushrooms 20 or more maggots is ok
  • In canned cranberry sauce there could be an average of 15% mold

The FDA finds these levels acceptable because there would be too much stress on food producers to adhere to a more stringent policy for food safety.

Correll plainly says, “You can’t cook the poop out of [food].”

The FDA begun the Reportable Food Registry in 2009 to handle the overwhelming notifications to human health hazards their relaxed policies produced.

The problems were hard to decipher with domestic food processing corporations, but foreign import food corporations added a cog in the wheel. These corporations generally go to greater lengths to preserve the safety of their food; more so than the FDA.

As it stands, the FDA reconditions food that we purchase in grocery stores.

There is no way to know what foods are genuine and which have been reconditioned.

Susanne Posel, Occupy Corporatism

About the Author

- Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of OccupyCorporatism and a globally syndicated host of the Region 10 Report broadcast on American Freedom Radio. Susanne Posel is a productive writer of news, opinion and analysis on a wide range of subjects, including globalism, corporatism and the New World Order. Other subjects include eugenics, climate change controversies, martial law, the technocratic banking elite and second amendment rights. Susanne Posel is a political and social activist, believing in non-compliance. Susanne Posel´s articles are widely published in independent or alternative media. She has been featured on radio shows such as The Hagman & Hagman Report, Wide Awake News with Charlie McGrath, Red Ice Radio, Lorrie´s Talk News Radio, The Vinny Eastwood Show, SGT Report, The Corbett Report, United We Strike Monthly Marathon. Susanne Posel began contributing to nsnbc international in June 2013. She can be contacted by e-mail at

Displaying 2 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. Fahwad al-Khadoumi says:

    Never possible to write completely free of bias.
    In this case, the headline, written by a US citizen..
    To sum it up as I understand this from a quick review:
    1) Chinese Authorities stop a Chinese Company,
    2) Which is based in the USA
    3) from practicing something that is illegal in China
    4) but which is legal and normal in the USA…
    5) and practiced by a lot of US based corporations in the US…
    That would make Chinese authorities take better care of US citizens than US authorities… THAT could also have been put in the headline, right?

  2. Kelly Smunt says:

    Yum YUM

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>