" />
Published On: Sun, Aug 25th, 2013

Former Jabhat al-Nusrah Member admits Chemical Weapons Use

Share This

Christof Lehmann (nsnbc) ,- Abdola Al-Jaledi, a former high-ranking member of the Jabhat al-Nusrah front has revealed on his Twitter account @abo_almonthir, that his Jabhat al-Nusrah colleagues are in possession of chemical weapons, reports the independent Syrian Dampress Online Journal. 

A former member of the al-Qaeda associated, foreign-backed Jabhat al-Nusrah front which is fighting the Syrian Armed Forces in an attempt to oust the Syrian government to establish an Islamic Sharia state, has admitted that Jabhat al-Nusrah is in possession of chemical weapons, to be used in attacks in Syria.

The Syrian Dampress Online Journal reports, that the Saudi Arabian terrorist, Abdola al-Jaledi has recently revealed on his Twitter account, @abo_almonthir, that his colleagues are storing toxic agents.

Al-Jaledi, who is a former, high-ranking member of the Jabhat al-Nusrah has reportedly left the al-Nusrah to continue fighting with another, also al-Qaeda associated brigade.

On his Twitter account, Al-Jaledi apparently said: “If it was not for confidentiality on this matter, I would reveal who was the fighter who made the said chemical bombs”.

phone intercepts aug 2013On Thursday, Syrian television released two intercepted telephone conversations among members of the so-called “Shuhada al-Bayada Battalion” and their Saudi Arabian liaison, the Egypt based financier Adulbasit, in which the terrorists were admitting that the group had used chemical weapons in Deir Balba, in the countryside of Homs.

The revelations occur as an international campaign, led primarily by the USA, UK and France, in the attempt to justify an illegal military aggression against Syria intensifies.

The government of the Syrian Arab Republic is rejecting the claims that the Syrian Armed Forces should have used chemical weapons and is fully cooperating with the team of UN Inspectors which are currently in Syria on invitation of the Syrian government.

Russian diplomatic sources describe the alleged chemical weapons attack as “provocative act”, alleging that any such attack, whether it really happened or it was staged, is an expected, provocative act.

After receiving credible information from a Palestinian intelligence source, nsnbc international published a report on 7 July, warning that the foreign-backed political and military opposition as well as the international alliance of nations supporting them, were planning a renewed political and military campaign against Syria in August and September, and that large scale chemical weapons use should justify renewed calls for a no-fly-zone, humanitarian corridors and a military intervention.

Yesterday, the Syrian Armed Forces seized chemicals, atropine antidotes and other military equipment for chemical weapons attacks in a tunnel used by the insurgents near Damascus.

*   *   *

Read also:

Malaysia charges former army captain and woman for terrorism and for recruiting mercenaries for Syria

Did you know that you can read nsnbc international on your iPhone, Cell Phone and other mobile devices, and that you can subscribe to nsnbc international to get free news, opinion and analysis every day ? To subscribe, go to the bottom of this page.

About the Author

- Dr. Christof Lehmann is the founder and editor of nsnbc. He is a psychologist and former independent political consultant on conflict, conflict resolution and a wide range of other political issues. In March 2013 he established nsnbc as a daily, independent, international on-line newspaper. He can be contacted at nsnbc international at

Displaying 4 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. Jan Kortkamp says:

    These are all important clues but tweets and alleged intercepted phone calls do not evidence make. We need real, substantiated evidence.

    • Correct.
      And the “clues” can be substantiated if they are brought before a prosecutor who investigates them.That is why it is important to draw attention to them. Besides that, sure, we do need an unbiased expert investigation – but even an expert report does not justify an illegal military intervention – regardless the outcome.

    • clint says:

      who is we a$$hole?
      “we” know it’s true

      • nsnbc says:

        I don´t know Clint,a nsnbc reader like you, but even if he is not as confident about the report being valid as you or I, he has still the right to say his opinion without being called an ##hole (sorry, no Dollar signs on my keyboard) :D.. Warm regards. Christof Lehmann

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>