Published On: Sun, Oct 19th, 2014

Division over bank as Australia caught between China and US

Michelle Grattan (TC) : Senior cabinet ministers are believed to be divided over whether Australia should sign up to an internationally funded infrastructure development bank that China is set to launch next month.

Treasurer Joe Hockey wants Australia to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. EPA/DREW ANGERER

Treasurer Joe Hockey wants Australia to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. EPA/DREW ANGERER

Treasurer Joe Hockey is open to the idea of Australia joining the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank but Foreign Minister Julie Bishop is opposed. It is understood that Trade and Investment Minister Andrew Robb believes the proposal has merit and could add value to the region.

Australia has been under pressure from the United States not to participate in the new bank.

The position of Prime Minister Tony Abbott is unclear on the issue, that could have ramifications for the final days of bedding down the Australia-China free trade agreement which the government wants concluded this year and preferably by the G20 leaders meeting in Brisbane next month.

The Chinese plan is being viewed internationally in the wider geopolitical context of Chinese-US competition in the region. The Americans, who see the bank as potentially a way of China increasing its clout with countries in southeast Asia, have been strongly lobbying Australia to keep out of it.

The issue is to come before cabinet imminently, as China plans to announce the bank at the APEC summit, which will be held in Beijing in November. Hockey will be in Beijing next week for the APEC finance ministers meeting, where the bank will be a topic of discussion.

The bank fits in with Hockey’s pitch to G20 finance ministers that it is vital to get more investment in infrastructure to increase growth. Australia is promoting a target of lifting global growth by 2% over five years above what it would otherwise be. G20 countries have submitted individual action plans for growth, which heavily feature infrastructure development.

It is understood that Hockey has argued that if Australia is to have any influence with the new institution, it needs to be in it.

But Bishop maintains that the bank has potential governance problems, and it could become a slush fund for China to pursue its strategic interests in the region, with Australia ending up with no sway in a body into which it had put capital.

The bank would offer funds to underdeveloped countries in the region for projects in areas such as energy, telecommunications and transport. China says it will contribute much of the initial $US50 billion.

An article in the New York Times earlier this month reported that Americans officials had lobbied against the development bank “with unexpected determination and engaged in a vigorous campaign to persuade important allies to shun the project”.

“The dispute, the latest manifestation of Chinese-American competition in Asia, could escalate in coming weeks, as Beijing pushes to confirm South Korea and Australia as founding partners of the bank in time for [President Xi Jinping] to formally announce it at a summit meeting of Asian leaders in November. President Obama is scheduled to attend the meeting, and Washington is pressing the two countries to reject the Chinese plan,” the NYT article said.

China had asked dozens of nations to contribute funds, and hoped it would become a global institution that rivalled the World Bank.

“To give it broader scope, the Chinese have invited and won the support of some wealthy Middle East nations, including Qatar and Saudi Arabia. But if Washington persuades South Korea and Australia to abstain, it would all but ensure membership in the bank would be limited to smaller countries, depriving it of the prestige and respectability the Chinese seek,” the article said.

The US is arguing that the new body would undercut the World Bank and compromise environmental standards. But supporters of the Chinese plan point to the need for development and capital in the region.

Michelle Grattan, The Conversation

About the Author

- nsnbc international is a daily, international online newspaper, established on 25 February 2013. nsnbc international is independent from corporate, state or foundation funding and independent with regards to political parties. nsnbc international is free to read and free to subscribe to, because the need for daily news, analysis and opinion, and the need for independent media is universal. The decision to make nsnbc international freely available was made so all, also those in countries with the lowest incomes, and those inflicted by poverty can access our daily newspaper. To keep it this way however, we depend on your donation if you are in a position to donate a modest amount whenever you can or on a regular basis. Besides articles from nsnbc's regular contributors and staff writers, including it's editor and founder, Christof Lehmann, it features selected articles from other contributors through its cooperation with media partners such as Global Research, The 4th Media, Aydinlik Daily, AltThaiNews Network, New Eastern Outlook, The Cairo Post and others.

Displaying 1 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. Lutz Barz says:

    Australia got suckered by the Amerikans yet again. Cringeworthy. So where is Murdoch’s outrage? Where is the so-called opposition on this? We have missed out on something monumental and historical. It’s as if this conservative-reactionary govt is in 1914.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>