The Truth About Tibet and Dalai Lama. Finland´s Media-censorship on Dalai Lama Truth
A bit closer to the truth, but of course it is so much different from the American/British version which have their hidden agenda.
I read an article by Elisabeth Nauclrs in the Aug 22 edition of Hufvudstadsbladet (Hbl) in which she expresses anger with the Finnish government and president for not according the Dalai Lama an official reception. I have read other writings on the Dalai Lama’s visit in Hbl, too, and decided to tell the truth about Tibet and the Dalai Lama.
The Dalai Lama is neither the spiritual leader of Tibet nor does he represent the region. He is the leader of just the Yellow Hat (Gelug) sect of Tibetan Buddhism, which is dominant in Lhasa. Tibet has been an autonomous region ruled by local kings serving Chinese emperors since the 8th century.
The duties of the Dalai Lama, as well as the Panchen Lama, were prescribed relatively late by the Chinese rulers for helping them with the administration of the faraway and difficult-to-access region.
The Chinese rulers made it clear that the Lama had to pass on these duties to the next incarnation, to be found following strict historical and religious rules. But even after the new incarnation was found, the Chinese emperor had the right to veto the choice.
The incarnation of the 14th Dalai Lama, who is now based in Dharamsala, India, was approved by the then national government of China. In short, a living Dalai Lama cannot choose his follower all by himself.
When the British invaded Lhasa in 1903 to snatch Tibet away from China, the 13th Dalai Lama disastrously declared that Tibetans were invulnerable, causing much bloodshed.
To escape the attack, the 13th Dalai Lama fled Tibet and took shelter in Inner Mongolia. The destitute Dalai Lama was soon found by the emperor and put under house arrest in a Tibetan prefecture of Qinghai province, where Baron Gustaf Mannerheim, then marshal of Finland, visited him in 1907.
The Russian czar, too, was interested in Tibet in order to expand his empire. But that stopped after the October Revolution.
The first decade of the 20th century was marked by political upheavals in China, and in chaos that followed the Boxer Rebellion, the Dalai Lama returned to Lhasa, which the British had left because they found it impossible to control the region for lack of transport facilities.

A 1959 cover of Time Magazine: It seems, according to a report from Germany’s Suddeutsche Zeitung, that when Tibet was occupied, The 14th Dalai Lama had to bend toward the temporal aspect of his post rather than the spirutual one, and agreed to CIA military aid for the Tibetan resistance.
Tibet’s peaceful liberation was achieved in 1951. When the People’s Liberation Army entered Tibet in 1951, Chairman Mao Zedong was hailed as the liberator by the Tibetans and the Dalai Lama.
The Dalai Lama got back part of his former powers and was made the vice-chairman of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee in 1954.
But these facts have been brushed under the carpet. What took place in 1951 was an internal change in China, and not the invasion of an ”independent” country. In 1957, the Chinese leaders decided to end slavery in Tibet.
Then, only about 5 percent of the Tibetans were monks or nuns, or belonged to the small noble class or free nomadic hunting tribes. The rest were slaves who had to toil to feed the non-productive elite of the population. That’s why the monasteries, the house of the elites, saw the abolition of slavery as a catastrophe.
Since he wanted slavery to continue to maintain his status as a god, the Dalai Lama began spreading rumors that he could be jailed and even executed, which led to an uprising in 1959.
But security forces soon brought it under control. It was then that the Dalai Lama fled the country and was “installed” in Dharamsala by the British and Americans, who used him as a weapon against Mao.
And the CIA created the myth of the “father of the nation” fighting for the “freedom” of Tibet. The Dalai Lama may have ceased to be politically important, but the myth created around him survives.
Up to 1959, Tibet could be reached only through some horse-trails. The local economy was in tatters and education was the privilege of the elite.
Normal schools were forbidden. Only schools in monasteries that taught religious scriptures were allowed. Worse, the slaves were called “talking cattle” and treated no better than cattle.
Now Tibet has a modern railway and airports. Today, there are schools and colleges for everybody in Tibet, and Lhasa even has a modern university.
Besides, schools are free for ethnic Tibetans, who comprise 90.48 percent of Tibet’s 3 million population, whereas Han Chinese have to pay for education.
Tibet is China’s autonomous region like the Aland Islands are Finland’s (or Scotland is to the United Kingdom). The region has an autonomous government, local laws and regulations, and a governor that is necessarily an ethnic Tibetan.
But the local government is subordinate to the central government, not the Dalai Lama.
In 2008, the Dalai Lama/CIA tried again to fuel an uprising in Tibet with the intention of prompting an international boycott of the Beijing Olympic Games.
I was living in China then and wrote three articles for Finnish newspapers, laying bare the truth about the riots in Lhasa but they were not published because of censorship.
Only Hbl had the courage to publish one of my articles, but that was reduced to a small piece in “the reader’s voice”. Finland’s censorship is what forced me to try and get the English version of my rejected article published.
As a private person, I have visited Tibet and was free to move wherever and do whatever I liked. So I don’t have to base my article on the canards against China that find the prime of places and time slots in the international print and electronic media.
The author Mr. Eirik Granqvist is a Finnish scholar.
Via The 4th Media – The 4th Media is an nsnbc partner media, located in Beijing.
Related articles:
Self-immolation Truth: Tibetan Buddhism Kidnapped by Politics
U.S. release of annual report on religious freedom unimaginative, counterproductive
A Compassionate Advise to the Saint Incarnate, Monk and King of Tibet.


























![Vernon Hershberger represented himself at pre-trial hearings in early 2012[Photo: Food Freedom Coalition]](http://i0.wp.com/nsnbc.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Vernon-Hershberger-represented-himself-at-pre-trial-hearings-in-early-2012Photo-Food-Freedom-Coalition.jpg?resize=50%2C50)

I really DID wonder about Tibet and the ~DL and what was going on. This article clarifies it and it helps me to understand and make sense in the smog of lies we are constantly fed. To be sure I fell under the delusion of lies but came to question this more and more and especially as the foreign policies of the Western nations become more readily apparent. Thankyou for this article. Paljon kiitoksia
You say that you have visited Tibet and have been “free to move wherever and do whatever [you] liked.” I have never been there, but have a friend who went there without any real bias regarding the Tibetan question (I know him that good ;). He told me of one situation, where he talked to a Tibetan and was asking him about his opinion about the Tibetan question, as he got hold of a Chinese who was apparantly observing the conversation and by doing so eventually succeeded in making the Tibetan shut up and go his way.
Mostly the truth lies between the two extremes, and I personally would never incline to see myself as the promoter of the one and only truth…
The “GermanOne” – You are missing several points: I am, in spite of my Palestinian origin, brought up in Buddhist tradition since my childhood. Publishing “self-immolation handbooks” has nothing what so-ever to do with Buddhism, let alone the office of a Lama or Monk. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/indepth/2013-03/01/c_132201527.htm . It appalls me as a Buddhist, that someone like that claims to represent me – us. But you are missing another point entirely. THIS ARTICLE, is about “Media Censorship in Finland” That is actually the only “real on topic part to comment on”. ;)
Dalailama- a holder of slaves oppresser of women and a blood sucker of the Tibetans- China has liberated Tibet from feudal circumstances- and therefore all the follwers of dalailama are former feudals and blind sheep to follow an oppressor who is preaching “democracy”.
I don´t necessarily agree with your conclusions about the people following him and find them unproductive, but the basic facts are correct. *China did liberate the Tibetans from a feudal system and serfdom * the Dalai Lama or rather his brother has spilled Tibetan blood with a CIA-backed, attempted subversion – and here are a few more facts * the office of Dalai Lama was an invention of Chinese Emperors to have a kind of vice roy * the Dalai Lama has cracked rather hard down on the old Nyingma and Bon monasteries and tried to Gelugpa-ize them * the latest outrage is his despotic crackdown on the Dorje Shugden practitioners – for which he tries to invent highly questionable, invalid theological arguments – which is just one more abuse of his office * but most prominently, one has just to look at his own behavior, his political track-record, his theologial track-record, his human rights track-record, the utterly shameful encouragement and peer pressure methods to force youth to selfimolation,and then one can see, that may-be he has the title of the Dalai Lama, but every now and then, those who try to find him after his rebirth make a mistake ;)